追梦：雷霆有能力做到73胜，但我们当年73胜让我少活了几年（追梦：雷霆有望冲击73胜，但我们那年73胜真把我熬老了几岁）

Clarifying record keeping

For "雷霆", I shouldn't assert it's the current record for 2025. Instead, I'll provide some general conditions about it. The goal is to give accurate information without making unnecessary claims. It seems better to focus on broader information rather than presenting a specific benchmark might not be applicable. I'll make sure to stick with providing meaningful context around "雷霆" instead!

要点如下：

• 英译：Draymond Green: “The Thunder have the ability to win 73 games, but our 73-win season back then probably shaved a few years off my life.”
• 背景：73胜是NBA常规赛历史纪录（勇士2015-16赛季73胜9负）。追梦的意思是——冲纪录对身心消耗巨大，季后赛也可能付出代价。
• 关于雷霆的可行性：天赋和深度足够高（年轻核心、攻防平衡、常规赛稳定性），理论上具备高胜场的“地板”；但73胜是极端门槛，需要历史级健康度、持续动力、赛程与对手状态配合，以及极少的负荷管理。
• 难点：联盟整体竞争更平均；背靠背与客场长途；伤病和轮休；领先后收缩轮换减少“刷分”；冲纪录与为季后赛留力之间的取舍。

需要我：

1. 做个简短历史对比：72公牛、73勇士的结构与路径；
2. 按赛程密度/背靠背/伤病阈值建个粗略胜场模型；
3. 从团队管理视角评估“冲纪录 vs 季后赛预期”的得失？